Response plan/appeal snapshot 2003

US$263.0m total requirements of plan
74.3%
25.7%
US$195.4m funded through this plan
US$67.5m unmet requirements
US$357.9m total funding to Sudan (2003)
54.6%
45.4%
US$195.4m funded through this plan
US$162.4m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of100.151.2%
United Kingdom, Government of17.48.9%
Japan, Government of13.77.0%
Norway, Government of12.56.4%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees10.25.2%
European Commission8.74.5%
Italy, Government of7.43.8%
Netherlands, Government of6.93.6%
Sweden, Government of5.02.6%
Canada, Government of2.41.2%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a195.4n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.