Response plan/appeal snapshot 2003

US$28.3m total requirements of plan
45.8%
54.2%
US$13.0m funded through this plan
US$15.3m unmet requirements
US$26.2m total funding to Congo (2003)
49.3%
50.7%
US$13.0m funded through this plan
US$13.3m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees5.743.8%
Japan, Government of2.116.1%
United States of America, Government of2.015.5%
Germany, Government of1.39.7%
United Nations Children's Fund0.53.9%
UNICEF National Committee/Italy0.32.3%
Private (individuals & organizations)0.32.2%
Italy, Government of0.32.2%
Sweden, Government of0.21.8%
Switzerland, Government of0.21.4%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a13.0n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.