Response plan/appeal snapshot 2003

US$313.8m total requirements of plan
55.1%
44.9%
US$172.9m funded through this plan
US$140.9m unmet requirements
US$235.7m total funding to Angola (2003)
73.3%
26.7%
US$172.9m funded through this plan
US$62.9m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of89.351.6%
European Commission19.011.0%
Sweden, Government of8.65.0%
Netherlands, Government of7.94.6%
France, Government of7.64.4%
World Food Programme5.02.9%
Japan, Government of4.32.5%
Norway, Government of4.12.4%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees4.02.3%
United Kingdom, Government of3.21.8%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a172.9n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.