Trends in response plan/appeal requirements
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - ZIMBABWE (July - December 2003)
https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/132/summary

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements
09-Mar-2021
Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - ZIMBABWE (July - December 2003)
https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/132/summary

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal
09-Mar-2021
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - ZIMBABWE (July - December 2003)
https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/132/summary

Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
09-Mar-2021
Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 7.2 | 32.4% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 7.2 | 32.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 2.9 | 13.1% |
United States of America, Government of | 2.7 | 11.9% |
Norway, Government of | 1.7 | 7.5% |
New Zealand, Government of | 0.1 | 0.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - ZIMBABWE (July - December 2003)
https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/132/summary

Funding progress by cluster
09-Mar-2021
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 22.3 | n/a |

Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2003
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - ZIMBABWE (July - December 2003)
https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/132/summary
Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2003
09-Mar-2021