Response plan/appeal snapshot 2003

US$92.3m total requirements of plan
24.1%
75.9%
US$22.3m funded through this plan
US$70.0m unmet requirements
US$407.3m total funding to Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa 2002 -2004
5.5%
94.5%
US$22.3m to Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - ZIMBABWE (July - December 2003)
US$385.1m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
European Commission7.232.4%
United Kingdom, Government of7.232.4%
Sweden, Government of2.913.1%
United States of America, Government of2.711.9%
Norway, Government of1.77.5%
Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations0.41.8%
United Nations Population Fund0.10.7%
New Zealand, Government of0.10.3%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a22.3n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.