Response plan/appeal snapshot 2004

US$119.0m total requirements of plan
46.7%
53.3%
US$55.6m funded through this plan
US$63.4m unmet requirements
US$101.6m total funding to Burundi (2004)
54.7%
45.3%
US$55.6m funded through this plan
US$46.1m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of11.821.2%
European Commission11.120.0%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees7.112.9%
Netherlands, Government of4.07.3%
Sweden, Government of3.86.8%
United Kingdom, Government of3.76.7%
Belgium, Government of3.76.6%
Norway, Government of3.66.5%
Canada, Government of1.42.6%
Japan, Government of1.01.8%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a55.6n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.