Response plan/appeal snapshot 2004

US$136.0m total requirements of plan
95.6%
4.4%
US$130.1m funded through this plan
US$6.0m unmet requirements
US$166.0m total funding to Angola (2004)
78.3%
21.7%
US$130.1m funded through this plan
US$36.0m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of47.636.6%
European Commission11.38.7%
Sweden, Government of9.06.9%
Netherlands, Government of6.65.1%
United Kingdom, Government of6.34.9%
Norway, Government of5.74.4%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees5.64.3%
France, Government of5.34.1%
Japan, Government of5.34.1%
Italy, Government of4.83.7%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a130.1n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.