Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2005

US$27.9m total requirements of plan
35.3%
64.7%
US$9.8m funded through this plan
US$18.0m unmet requirements
US$11.6m total funding to Central African Republic (2005)
85.1%
14.9%
US$9.8m funded through this plan
US$1.7m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
World Food Programme2.424.3%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees2.020.0%
Sweden, Government of1.414.4%
Norway, Government of0.99.3%
World Bank0.99.1%
Ireland, Government of0.55.3%
Finland, Government of0.54.8%
United States of America, Government of0.44.0%
UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom0.43.6%
UNICEF National Committee/Italy0.32.8%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a9.8n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.