Response plan/appeal snapshot 2004

US$90.0m total requirements of plan
14.2%
85.8%
US$12.8m funded through this plan
US$77.2m unmet requirements
US$41.7m total funding to Zimbabwe (2004)
30.7%
69.3%
US$12.8m funded through this plan
US$28.9m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
European Commission7.659.2%
South Africa, Government of1.915.1%
Japan, Government of1.29.5%
Sweden, Government of1.29.0%
Ireland, Government of0.53.9%
Switzerland, Government of0.21.6%
New Zealand, Government of0.21.3%
United Nations Population Fund0.10.4%
UNICEF National Committee/Canada0.00.0%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a12.8n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.