Response plan/appeal snapshot 2005

US$1.91bn total requirements of plan
53.3%
46.7%
US$1.02bn funded through this plan
US$891.3m unmet requirements
US$1.44bn total funding to Sudan (2005)
70.9%
29.1%
US$1.02bn funded through this plan
US$418.1m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of552.954.3%
European Commission96.39.5%
United Kingdom, Government of80.77.9%
Japan, Government of58.45.7%
Netherlands, Government of49.74.9%
Canada, Government of24.32.4%
Norway, Government of24.62.4%
Sweden, Government of17.41.7%
Germany, Government of14.21.4%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees13.21.3%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a1,018.9n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.