Response plan/appeal snapshot 2006

US$118.6m total requirements of plan
45.4%
54.6%
US$53.8m funded through this plan
US$64.8m unmet requirements
US$93.0m total funding to Burundi (2006)
57.9%
42.1%
US$53.8m funded through this plan
US$39.2m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
Japan, Government of10.820.1%
United States of America, Government of10.820.0%
European Commission7.213.3%
Central Emergency Response Fund3.97.3%
Belgium, Government of3.76.9%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees2.85.2%
Netherlands, Government of2.54.6%
Sweden, Government of2.34.3%
Norway, Government of1.63.0%
Germany, Government of1.62.9%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a53.8n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.