Response plan/appeal snapshot 2006

US$425.8m total requirements of plan
64.2%
35.8%
US$273.4m funded through this plan
US$152.4m unmet requirements
US$375.7m total funding to Zimbabwe (2006)
72.8%
27.2%
US$273.4m funded through this plan
US$102.3m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
World Food Programme196.571.9%
European Commission41.315.1%
Sweden, Government of5.72.1%
Ireland, Government of4.81.7%
United Kingdom, Government of4.11.5%
Japan, Government of3.21.2%
Norway, Government of2.30.8%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees2.00.7%
Central Emergency Response Fund2.00.7%
Catholic Relief Services2.00.7%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
HEALTH0.01.10.0%
Not specifiedn/a272.3n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.