Response plan/appeal snapshot 2006

US$1.60bn total requirements of plan
67.5%
32.5%
US$1.08bn funded through this plan
US$518.2m unmet requirements
US$1.44bn total funding to Sudan (2006)
74.9%
25.1%
US$1.08bn funded through this plan
US$361.0m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of443.141.1%
European Commission117.610.9%
United Kingdom, Government of99.39.2%
World Food Programme76.67.1%
Netherlands, Government of60.35.6%
Sudan, Government of36.23.4%
Canada, Government of32.93.1%
World Bank30.12.8%
Central Emergency Response Fund25.52.4%
Norway, Government of22.42.1%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a1,076.9n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.