Response plan/appeal snapshot 2007

US$395.6m total requirements of plan
57.9%
42.1%
US$229.2m funded through this plan
US$166.4m unmet requirements
US$336.8m total funding to Zimbabwe (2007)
68.0%
32.0%
US$229.2m funded through this plan
US$107.7m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of73.432.0%
United Kingdom, Government of36.716.0%
European Commission29.012.6%
World Food Programme22.29.7%
Central Emergency Response Fund11.85.1%
Sweden, Government of6.72.9%
Germany, Government of6.52.8%
Canada, Government of5.92.6%
Japan, Government of6.12.6%
Ireland, Government of5.72.5%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a229.2n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.