Sri Lanka Floods Flash Appeal (Revised) (January - June 2011)
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
19-Mar-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 6.1 | 23.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 3.3 | 12.5% |
European Commission | 3.1 | 11.6% |
Australia, Government of | 2.8 | 10.6% |
Norway, Government of | 1.7 | 6.5% |
United States of America, Government of | 1.7 | 6.3% |
Canada, Government of | 1.5 | 5.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 0.9 | 3.2% |
Germany, Government of | 0.7 | 2.6% |
New Zealand, Government of | 0.6 | 2.3% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
EDUCATION AND SPORTS | 2.3 | 0.9 | 40.9% |
FOOD SECURITY, AGRICULTURE, LIVELIHOOD | 25.8 | 15.1 | 58.5% |
HEALTH AND NUTRITION | 3.5 | 0.9 | 25.4% |
LOGISTICS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% |
SHELTER / NFI / PERMANENT HOUSING | 8.3 | 4.7 | 56.0% |
WASH | 6.5 | 5.0 | 77.5% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2011
Sri Lanka Floods Flash Appeal (Revised) (January - June 2011)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/364/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2011
19-Mar-2024