Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
| Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| European Commission | 7.3 | 30.7% |
| Central Emergency Response Fund | 6.2 | 26.1% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 3.2 | 13.5% |
| United States of America, Government of | 2.5 | 10.5% |
| Japan, Government of | 2.3 | 9.7% |
| Switzerland, Government of | 0.5 | 2.3% |
| Canada, Government of | 0.5 | 2.1% |
| China, Government of | 0.5 | 2.1% |
| Belgium, Government of | 0.3 | 1.3% |
| Luxembourg, Government of | 0.3 | 1.1% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COORDINATION | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| FOOD SECURITY | 33.3 | 22.1 | 66.4% |
| HEALTH AND NUTRITION | 3.3 | 1.5 | 45.5% |
| PROTECTION | 0.9 | 0.2 | 22.0% |
About Appeals/Plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country.
The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.