Response plan/appeal snapshot 2001

US$32.5m total requirements of plan
37.2%
62.8%
US$12.1m funded through this plan
US$20.4m unmet requirements
US$15.7m total funding to Congo (2001)
76.8%
23.2%
US$12.1m funded through this plan
US$3.7m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees3.025.1%
United States of America, Government of2.924.4%
Japan, Government of2.419.5%
World Bank1.08.3%
Sweden, Government of0.87.0%
European Commission0.75.7%
Belgium, Government of0.32.6%
Switzerland, Government of0.32.5%
Italy, Government of0.32.2%
Chevron Texaco0.11.2%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a12.1n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.