Trends in response plan/appeal requirements
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
| Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 79.8 | 37.7% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 26.4 | 12.5% |
| European Commission | 17.9 | 8.5% |
| Japan, Government of | 14.2 | 6.7% |
| Not specified | 9.5 | 4.5% |
| Canada, Government of | 6.2 | 2.9% |
| Switzerland, Government of | 5.1 | 2.4% |
| Central Emergency Response Fund | 4.9 | 2.3% |
| Sweden, Government of | 4.5 | 2.1% |
| Australia, Government of | 3.7 | 1.8% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-sector assistance for refugees | 657.8 | 211.3 | 32.1% |
About Appeals/Plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country.
The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.