Trends in response plan/appeal requirements
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
| Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| European Commission | 2.4 | 36.5% |
| Not specified | 1.5 | 23.5% |
| Luxembourg, Government of | 1.0 | 14.9% |
| France, Government of | 0.9 | 13.8% |
| United States of America, Government of | 0.3 | 4.8% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Germany | 0.1 | 2.2% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Spain | 0.1 | 2.0% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Denmark | 0.1 | 1.8% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Australia | 0.0 | 0.3% |
| UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom | 0.0 | 0.3% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| FOOD SECURITY | 4.8 | 0.6 | 11.9% |
| NUTRITION | 4.3 | 5.6 | 131.9% |
| WATER AND SANITATION | 0.8 | 0.3 | 38.2% |
About Appeals/Plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country.
The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.