Response plan/appeal snapshot 2016

US$352.3m total requirements of plan
47.4%
52.6%
US$166.9m funded through this plan
US$185.5m unmet requirements
US$229.0m total funding to Zimbabwe (2016)
72.9%
27.1%
US$166.9m funded through this plan
US$62.1m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of98.559.0%
United Kingdom, Government of27.716.6%
European Commission11.56.9%
World Food Programme7.34.4%
Japan, Government of6.43.8%
Canada, Government of5.53.3%
Sweden, Government of2.31.4%
Zimbabwe, Government of2.41.4%
Germany, Government of1.71.0%
Italy, Government of1.10.7%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Coordination0.60.00.0%
Food Security and Agriculture278.696.134.5%
Nutrition and Health25.74.617.8%
Protection8.70.00.0%
WASH38.815.539.9%
Not specifiedn/a50.7n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.