Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2016

US$352.3m total requirements of plan
47.4%
52.6%
US$166.9m funded through this plan
US$185.5m unmet requirements
US$231.3m total funding to Zimbabwe (2016)
72.1%
27.9%
US$166.9m funded through this plan
US$64.4m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of98.559.0%
United Kingdom, Government of27.716.6%
European Commission11.56.9%
Japan, Government of6.43.8%
Canada, Government of5.53.3%
Sweden, Government of2.31.4%
Zimbabwe, Government of2.41.4%
Germany, Government of1.71.0%
Italy, Government of1.10.7%
UNICEF National Committee/Japan0.60.4%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Coordination0.60.00.0%
Food Security and Agriculture278.60.00.0%
Food Security and Agriculture0.096.10.0%
Nutrition and Health25.70.00.0%
Nutrition and Health0.04.60.0%
Protection8.70.00.0%
WASH38.80.00.0%
WASH0.015.50.0%
Not specifiedn/a50.7n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.