Trends in response plan/appeal requirements
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
| Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Italy, Government of | 7.7 | 25.4% |
| Japan, Government of | 3.6 | 11.8% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 2.9 | 9.6% |
| United States of America, Government of | 2.9 | 9.5% |
| Sweden, Government of | 2.5 | 8.2% |
| Norway, Government of | 1.8 | 6.0% |
| European Commission | 1.8 | 5.9% |
| Denmark, Government of | 1.1 | 3.6% |
| Finland, Government of | 0.7 | 2.3% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 0.6 | 2.0% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not specified | n/a | 30.5 | n/a |
About Appeals/Plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country.
The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.