Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2017

US$119.9m total requirements of plan
101.8%
-1.8%
US$122.1m funded through this plan
US$0.0 unmet requirements
US$173.4m total funding to Kenya Drought 2017
70.4%
29.6%
US$122.1m funded through this plan
US$51.3m outside this plan

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of55.245.2%
United Kingdom, Government of18.214.9%
Central Emergency Response Fund10.38.5%
Germany, Government of9.98.1%
European Commission8.16.6%
Sweden, Government of5.04.1%
Canada, Government of4.23.4%
World Food Programme4.13.3%
Australia, Government of1.81.5%
Denmark, Government of1.21.0%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Agriculture and Livelihood17.81.69.2%
Coordination0.10.00.0%
Early Recovery4.50.00.0%
Education1.82.3129.7%
Food Security38.749.5127.9%
Health4.31.637.6%
Nutrition29.840.3135.5%
Protection5.31.223.5%
WASH17.614.179.8%
Not specifiedn/a11.4n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.