Trends in response plan/appeal requirements
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
| Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 4.4 | 25.7% |
| Not specified | 4.1 | 23.5% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 3.2 | 18.6% |
| Japan, Government of | 2.8 | 16.2% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.8 | 4.9% |
| Belgium, Government of | 0.6 | 3.4% |
| Australia, Government of | 0.4 | 2.6% |
| Germany, Government of | 0.2 | 0.9% |
| Stichting Vluchteling | 0.1 | 0.6% |
| Norway, Government of | 0.1 | 0.5% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not specified | n/a | 17.2 | n/a |
About Appeals/Plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country.
The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.