Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2000

US$27.4m total requirements of plan
$17.2m
$10.2m
62.9% funded through this plan
37.1% unmet requirements
US$19.6m total funding to Uganda (2000)
$17.2m
$2.4m
87.8% funded through this plan
12.2% outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of4.425.7%
Not specified4.123.5%
United Kingdom, Government of3.218.6%
Japan, Government of2.816.2%
Sweden, Government of0.84.9%
Belgium, Government of0.63.4%
Australia, Government of0.42.6%
Germany, Government of0.20.9%
Stichting Vluchteling0.10.6%
Norway, Government of0.10.5%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a17.2n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.