Response plan/appeal snapshot 2001

US$182.1m total requirements of plan
62.9%
37.1%
US$114.5m funded through this plan
US$67.6m unmet requirements
US$130.5m total funding to Kenya Drought 2001
87.7%
12.3%
US$114.5m funded through this plan
US$16.0m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of90.579.0%
Kenya, Government of14.512.6%
France, Government of1.91.6%
United Kingdom, Government of1.11.0%
UNICEF National Committee/Japan1.00.9%
Japan, Government of1.00.9%
Canada, Government of0.90.8%
European Commission0.90.7%
Norway, Government of0.50.5%
Germany, Government of0.50.4%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a114.5n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.