Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding
| Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 15.9 | 63.2% |
| Central Emergency Response Fund | 8.9 | 35.2% |
| Belgium, Government of | 0.4 | 1.6% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture | 11.1 | 1.2 | 10.8% |
| Child protection sub-sector | 3.7 | 0.3 | 7.5% |
| Early Recovery | 16.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Education | 9.7 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Food Security | 130.0 | 20.8 | 16.0% |
| Health | 37.4 | 0.6 | 1.6% |
| Nutrition | 8.7 | 0.6 | 6.7% |
| Protection-GBV sub-sector | 0.8 | 0.2 | 25.3% |
| Refugees | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| WASH | 12.7 | 1.5 | 11.8% |
About Appeals/Plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country.
The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.