Response plan/appeal snapshot for 2002

US$68.1m total requirements of plan
62.4%
37.6%
US$42.5m funded through this plan
US$25.6m unmet requirements
US$56.0m total funding to Uganda (2002)
75.9%
24.1%
US$42.5m funded through this plan
US$13.5m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United States of America, Government of16.939.9%
Japan, Government of5.112.1%
Germany, Government of1.63.8%
United Kingdom, Government of1.63.7%
Sweden, Government of0.71.6%
Italy, Government of0.61.3%
Norway, Government of0.51.3%
Canada, Government of0.41.1%
Espana con ACNUR0.40.9%
Netherlands, Government of0.40.9%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a42.5n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.