Response plan/appeal snapshot 2002

US$72.0m total requirements of plan
38.8%
61.2%
US$28.0m funded through this plan
US$44.1m unmet requirements
US$53.5m total funding to Burundi (2002)
52.3%
47.7%
US$28.0m funded through this plan
US$25.5m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
European Commission10.637.9%
United States of America, Government of5.017.8%
Netherlands, Government of2.910.5%
Belgium, Government of2.69.2%
Sweden, Government of1.34.8%
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees1.34.7%
Norway, Government of1.14.0%
Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations0.82.8%
Denmark, Government of0.62.2%
Finland, Government of0.41.3%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a28.0n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.