Response plan/appeal snapshot 2002

US$35.4m total requirements of plan
38.3%
61.7%
US$13.6m funded through this plan
US$21.8m unmet requirements
US$15.4m total funding to Congo (2002)
88.1%
11.9%
US$13.6m funded through this plan
US$1.8m outside this plan

Trends in response plan/appeal requirements

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Funding trends inside and outside the response plan/appeal

Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.

Largest sources of response plan/appeal funding

Funding for response plan/appeal (US$m)As a share of overall funding to the response plan/appeal (%)
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees4.633.9%
Japan, Government of1.612.1%
World Food Programme1.611.8%
United States of America, Government of1.39.7%
Germany, Government of0.96.8%
Sweden, Government of0.85.6%
European Commission0.75.1%
Luxembourg, Government of0.53.5%
United Nations Development Programme0.42.7%
Belgium, Government of0.32.2%

Funding progress by cluster

Funding progress by cluster/sector

Cluster/SectorRequired (US$m)Funded (US$m)Coverage (%)
Not specifiedn/a13.6n/a

About Appeals/Plans

Each UN coordinated inter-agency response plan and appeal has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the response plan/appeal; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The response plans/appeals are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.