Indonesia 2003
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 11.9 | 38.9% |
Japan, Government of | 6.4 | 20.9% |
Australia, Government of | 2.9 | 9.7% |
European Commission | 2.9 | 9.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 1.5 | 5.0% |
Netherlands, Government of | 0.9 | 3.0% |
Switzerland, Government of | 0.7 | 2.4% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 0.6 | 1.9% |
Norway, Government of | 0.4 | 1.4% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 0.3 | 1.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 30.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2003
Indonesia 2003
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/108/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2003
12-Dec-2024