Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - MOZAMBIQUE (July 2003 - June 2004)
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
03-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
03-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
South Africa, Government of | 1.4 | 25.7% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 1.0 | 19.2% |
Denmark, Government of | 0.8 | 15.6% |
Netherlands, Government of | 0.6 | 11.2% |
Belgium, Government of | 0.4 | 6.8% |
UNICEF National Committee/Germany | 0.4 | 6.6% |
Portugal, Government of | 0.3 | 5.8% |
Sweden, Government of | 0.3 | 5.7% |
UNICEF National Committee/Belgium | 0.2 | 3.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 5.3 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2003
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa - MOZAMBIQUE (July 2003 - June 2004)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/129/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2003
03-Dec-2024