Uganda 2004
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 41.8 | 37.3% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 16.9 | 15.0% |
European Commission | 7.8 | 6.9% |
Canada, Government of | 7.1 | 6.3% |
Sweden, Government of | 6.9 | 6.1% |
Netherlands, Government of | 5.6 | 5.0% |
Japan, Government of | 4.6 | 4.1% |
Belgium, Government of | 3.2 | 2.8% |
Germany, Government of | 1.5 | 1.4% |
Norway, Government of | 1.5 | 1.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 112.3 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
Uganda 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/137/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
10-Dec-2024