Eritrea 2004
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Eritrea 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/148/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 26.3 | 35.1% |
| European Commission | 17.7 | 23.6% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 4.7 | 6.3% |
| Sweden, Government of | 4.0 | 5.3% |
| Canada, Government of | 3.6 | 4.8% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 3.2 | 4.3% |
| Norway, Government of | 3.1 | 4.2% |
| Japan, Government of | 1.9 | 2.5% |
| Finland, Government of | 1.3 | 1.7% |
| Ireland, Government of | 1.0 | 1.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Eritrea 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/148/summary
Funding progress by cluster
10-Dec-2024
: US$0
Not specified: US$74,941,367
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 74.9 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
Eritrea 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/148/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
10-Dec-2024