Islamic Republic of Iran 2004
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
10-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
UNICEF National Committees | 6.2 | 32.6% |
Australia, Government of | 2.4 | 12.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 2.4 | 12.5% |
Belgium, Government of | 2.3 | 12.3% |
European Commission | 1.2 | 6.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 1.1 | 5.6% |
Stichting Vluchteling | 0.6 | 3.3% |
Ireland, Government of | 0.6 | 3.3% |
Japan, Government of | 0.5 | 2.6% |
India, Government of | 0.4 | 2.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 19.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
Islamic Republic of Iran 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/153/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
10-Dec-2024