Zimbabwe 2004
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Zimbabwe 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/175/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
22-Apr-2025
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| European Commission | 7.6 | 59.2% |
| South Africa, Government of | 1.9 | 15.1% |
| Japan, Government of | 1.2 | 9.5% |
| Sweden, Government of | 1.2 | 9.0% |
| Ireland, Government of | 0.5 | 3.9% |
| Switzerland, Government of | 0.2 | 1.6% |
| New Zealand, Government of | 0.2 | 1.3% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Canada | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Funding progress by cluster
Zimbabwe 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/175/summary
Funding progress by cluster
22-Apr-2025
: US$0
Not specified: US$12,829,164
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 12.8 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
Zimbabwe 2004
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/175/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2004
22-Apr-2025