Angola Marburg VHF 2005
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
12-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 1.1 | 36.2% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 0.6 | 17.9% |
Netherlands, Government of | 0.4 | 11.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 0.3 | 9.9% |
Portugal, Government of | 0.3 | 8.6% |
Canada, Government of | 0.1 | 4.4% |
Belgium, Government of | 0.1 | 4.0% |
Germany, Government of | 0.1 | 3.8% |
Japan, Government of | 0.1 | 3.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 3.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2005
Angola Marburg VHF 2005
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/182/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2005
12-Dec-2024