Guinea 2006
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 2.3 | 14.5% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 1.6 | 10.2% |
Sweden, Government of | 0.9 | 5.7% |
Ireland, Government of | 0.8 | 4.9% |
European Commission | 0.7 | 4.3% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 0.4 | 2.4% |
France, Government of | 0.2 | 1.5% |
Luxembourg, Government of | 0.2 | 1.5% |
UNICEF National Committee/Sweden | 0.1 | 0.3% |
Spain, Government of | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
HEALTH | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 15.9 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Guinea 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/191/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
12-Dec-2024