Republic of Congo 2006
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Republic of Congo 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/193/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
16-Feb-2026
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 2.0 | 15.7% |
| Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 2.0 | 15.4% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.9 | 7.0% |
| European Commission | 0.4 | 3.2% |
| Japan, Government of | 0.3 | 2.0% |
| Congo, Government of | 0.2 | 1.9% |
| OPEC Fund for International Development | 0.1 | 0.4% |
| Spain, Government of | 0.0 | 0.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Republic of Congo 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/193/summary
Funding progress by cluster
16-Feb-2026
: US$0
Not specified: US$12,799,622
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEALTH | 0.9 | 0.2 | 20.9% |
| RECOVERY & REINTEGRATION | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 12.8 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Republic of Congo 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/193/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
16-Feb-2026