Central African Republic 2006
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Central African Republic 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/201/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
22-Apr-2025
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 4.9 | 20.4% |
| United States of America, Government of | 3.5 | 14.7% |
| France, Government of | 2.7 | 11.2% |
| Japan, Government of | 1.9 | 8.1% |
| Ireland, Government of | 1.6 | 6.7% |
| Sweden, Government of | 1.1 | 4.7% |
| Norway, Government of | 0.8 | 3.3% |
| Not specified | 0.7 | 3.1% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 0.5 | 2.2% |
| Finland, Government of | 0.5 | 2.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Central African Republic 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/201/summary
Funding progress by cluster
22-Apr-2025
: US$0
Not specified: US$23,989,707
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 24.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Central African Republic 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/201/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
22-Apr-2025