North Caucasus Transitional Workplan 2006
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
10-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 23.7 | 41.9% |
United States of America, Government of | 6.3 | 11.2% |
Netherlands, Government of | 4.2 | 7.4% |
Switzerland, Government of | 4.0 | 7.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 3.9 | 6.9% |
Canada, Government of | 2.8 | 5.0% |
Norway, Government of | 2.5 | 4.3% |
Denmark, Government of | 1.6 | 2.9% |
UNICEF National Committee/Germany | 0.4 | 0.8% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 0.4 | 0.6% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 56.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
North Caucasus Transitional Workplan 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/207/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
10-Dec-2024