Horn of Africa 2006
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Horn of Africa 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/208/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
04-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 16.8 | 38.4% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 8.7 | 20.0% |
| United States of America, Government of | 6.3 | 14.5% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 2.2 | 5.1% |
| Sweden, Government of | 1.7 | 4.0% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Germany | 1.5 | 3.5% |
| Canada, Government of | 1.4 | 3.2% |
| Ireland, Government of | 1.0 | 2.2% |
| Norway, Government of | 0.9 | 2.1% |
| UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom | 0.8 | 1.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Horn of Africa 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/208/summary
Funding progress by cluster
04-Dec-2024
: US$0
Not specified: US$43,672,625
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 43.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Horn of Africa 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/208/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
04-Dec-2024