Ethiopia 2006 Humanitarian Appeal (Joint Govt-NGO-UN)
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
03-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 134.5 | 53.3% |
Ethiopia, Government of | 45.4 | 18.0% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 15.8 | 6.3% |
Canada, Government of | 14.4 | 5.7% |
Netherlands, Government of | 10.9 | 4.3% |
Norway, Government of | 9.3 | 3.7% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 4.2 | 1.7% |
Japan, Government of | 3.9 | 1.5% |
Sweden, Government of | 3.1 | 1.2% |
Italy, Government of | 2.2 | 0.9% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 252.1 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Ethiopia 2006 Humanitarian Appeal (Joint Govt-NGO-UN)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/209/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
03-Dec-2024