Timor-Leste 2006
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
10-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Japan, Government of | 5.0 | 20.0% |
Australia, Government of | 3.7 | 14.9% |
European Commission | 3.3 | 13.3% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 3.3 | 13.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 1.4 | 5.4% |
Norway, Government of | 1.1 | 4.5% |
United States of America, Government of | 1.1 | 4.3% |
Spain, Government of | 0.7 | 2.7% |
UNICEF National Committee/Portugal | 0.6 | 2.4% |
Ireland, Government of | 0.5 | 1.9% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
COMMUNICATION | 0.6 | 0.5 | 73.5% |
COORDINATION | 0.5 | 0.5 | 90.3% |
EARLY RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION | 0.2 | 0.2 | 100.0% |
EDUCATION | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
EMERGENCY SHELTER AND PROTECTION | 7.9 | 7.5 | 95.1% |
FOOD | 9.7 | 9.3 | 95.5% |
HEALTH AND NUTRITION | 2.4 | 0.1 | 5.5% |
LOGISTICS | 0.9 | 1.4 | 150.0% |
WATER & SANITATION | 1.7 | 1.6 | 97.7% |
Not specified | n/a | 4.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Timor-Leste 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/212/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
10-Dec-2024