Lebanon Crisis 2006
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Lebanon Crisis 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/214/summary
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
12-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| European Commission | 25.1 | 21.1% |
| United States of America, Government of | 17.8 | 15.0% |
| Norway, Government of | 6.9 | 5.8% |
| Canada, Government of | 5.3 | 4.5% |
| France, Government of | 5.1 | 4.3% |
| Sweden, Government of | 5.1 | 4.3% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 5.0 | 4.2% |
| Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 5.0 | 4.2% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 4.8 | 4.0% |
| Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of), Government of | 4.5 | 3.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Lebanon Crisis 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/214/summary
Funding progress by cluster
12-Dec-2024
: US$0
Not specified: US$118,959,965
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 119.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
Lebanon Crisis 2006
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/214/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2006
12-Dec-2024