Zimbabwe 2007
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 73.4 | 32.0% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 36.7 | 16.0% |
European Commission | 29.0 | 12.6% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 11.8 | 5.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 6.7 | 2.9% |
Germany, Government of | 6.5 | 2.8% |
Japan, Government of | 6.1 | 2.6% |
Canada, Government of | 5.9 | 2.6% |
Netherlands, Government of | 5.8 | 2.5% |
Ireland, Government of | 5.7 | 2.5% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 229.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2007
Zimbabwe 2007
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/220/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2007
01-Dec-2024