Uganda 2007
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
05-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 85.4 | 30.5% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 34.9 | 12.5% |
European Commission | 34.1 | 12.2% |
Norway, Government of | 18.5 | 6.6% |
Sweden, Government of | 11.0 | 3.9% |
Canada, Government of | 7.6 | 2.7% |
Japan, Government of | 7.3 | 2.6% |
Netherlands, Government of | 7.0 | 2.5% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 7.0 | 2.5% |
Germany, Government of | 6.2 | 2.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 8.1 | 4.5 | 55.4% |
EARLY RECOVERY | 9.8 | 3.5 | 36.0% |
EDUCATION | 16.3 | 3.8 | 23.6% |
FOOD SECURITY | 165.8 | 165.4 | 99.8% |
HEALTH, NUTRITION AND HIV/AIDS | 47.5 | 22.0 | 46.3% |
MINE ACTION | 6.5 | 2.3 | 35.3% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 33.0 | 33.0 | 100.1% |
PROTECTION / HUMAN RIGHTS / RULE OF LAW | 42.6 | 29.7 | 69.6% |
SECURITY | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
WATER & SANITATION | 20.7 | 13.8 | 66.8% |
Not specified | n/a | 1.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2007
Uganda 2007
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/230/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2007
05-Dec-2024