Zimbabwe 2008
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 216.2 | 54.0% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 43.4 | 10.8% |
Netherlands, Government of | 25.3 | 6.3% |
European Commission | 21.3 | 5.3% |
Australia, Government of | 14.8 | 3.7% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 11.7 | 2.9% |
Sweden, Government of | 8.1 | 2.0% |
Canada, Government of | 7.8 | 1.9% |
Ireland, Government of | 5.8 | 1.4% |
Japan, Government of | 5.5 | 1.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 53.7 | 10.6 | 19.7% |
COORDINATION | 3.2 | 2.1 | 63.2% |
EDUCATION | 5.0 | 2.3 | 46.6% |
FOOD | 411.0 | 317.3 | 77.2% |
HEALTH | 29.8 | 19.0 | 63.7% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 52.0 | 24.9 | 47.8% |
NUTRITION | 4.4 | 0.6 | 14.1% |
PROTECTION | 6.5 | 1.3 | 20.0% |
SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS AT COMMUNITY LEVEL | 5.5 | 0.1 | 1.7% |
WATER AND SANITATION | 9.3 | 8.4 | 89.7% |
Not specified | n/a | 14.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
Zimbabwe 2008
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/260/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
01-Dec-2024