Southern African Region Preparedness and Response Plan 2008 [unrevised as of Nov. 2008; appeal closed at 33% funding and unmet requirements reduced to zero]
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
04-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Sweden, Government of | 4.8 | 16.4% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 4.3 | 14.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 3.0 | 10.1% |
United States of America, Government of | 2.9 | 9.9% |
Canada, Government of | 2.8 | 9.5% |
Denmark, Government of | 2.0 | 6.7% |
Germany, Government of | 2.0 | 6.6% |
Netherlands, Government of | 1.4 | 4.9% |
Spain, Government of | 1.4 | 4.7% |
Norway, Government of | 1.2 | 4.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 29.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
Southern African Region Preparedness and Response Plan 2008 [unrevised as of Nov. 2008; appeal closed at 33% funding and unmet requirements reduced to zero]
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/275/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
04-Dec-2024