Liberia Critical Humanitarian Gaps 2008
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Not specified | 15.8 | 58.2% |
European Commission | 4.0 | 14.6% |
Sweden, Government of | 2.5 | 9.2% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 1.9 | 7.0% |
United Nations Development Programme | 1.5 | 5.6% |
Japan, Government of | 0.8 | 3.1% |
Spain, Government of | 0.6 | 2.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
FOOD SECURITY | 31.8 | 19.5 | 61.5% |
HEALTH | 7.6 | 5.1 | 66.3% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 2.4 | 1.6 | 67.0% |
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 1.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
Liberia Critical Humanitarian Gaps 2008
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/279/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
12-Dec-2024