Timor-Leste - Transitional Strategy and Appeal 2008
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Australia, Government of | 5.8 | 32.2% |
European Commission | 3.2 | 17.7% |
Not specified | 2.2 | 12.2% |
United States of America, Government of | 1.2 | 6.8% |
Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of), Government of | 0.9 | 4.9% |
New Zealand, Government of | 0.8 | 4.6% |
Spain, Government of | 0.5 | 2.6% |
France, Government of | 0.3 | 1.7% |
Korea, Republic of, Government of | 0.3 | 1.7% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 0.2 | 1.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 18.1 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
Timor-Leste - Transitional Strategy and Appeal 2008
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/280/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
10-Dec-2024