Uganda 2009
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom, Government of | 30.3 | 16.1% |
United States of America, Government of | 24.1 | 12.8% |
European Commission | 21.7 | 11.5% |
Japan, Government of | 6.6 | 3.5% |
Spain, Government of | 6.4 | 3.4% |
Canada, Government of | 6.4 | 3.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 4.6 | 2.4% |
Netherlands, Government of | 4.0 | 2.1% |
Norway, Government of | 3.9 | 2.1% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 2.3 | 1.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coordination and Support Services | 7.7 | 4.6 | 58.8% |
Education | 3.3 | 0.3 | 9.6% |
Food Security and Agricultural Livelihoods (FSAL) | 145.3 | 146.5 | 100.8% |
Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS | 23.6 | 6.1 | 26.1% |
Multi-Sector (Refugee Programme) | 20.4 | 14.6 | 71.3% |
Protection | 27.3 | 8.8 | 32.3% |
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) | 19.4 | 5.9 | 30.2% |
Not specified | n/a | 1.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2009
Uganda 2009
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/287/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2009
10-Dec-2024