Zimbabwe 2009
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 91.3 | 20.0% |
European Commission | 48.6 | 10.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 37.5 | 8.2% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 26.8 | 5.9% |
Netherlands, Government of | 13.7 | 3.0% |
Canada, Government of | 12.9 | 2.8% |
Australia, Government of | 12.6 | 2.8% |
Denmark, Government of | 10.3 | 2.3% |
Sweden, Government of | 8.9 | 2.0% |
Japan, Government of | 8.8 | 1.9% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 142.4 | 83.1 | 58.4% |
COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES | 9.4 | 10.6 | 112.9% |
EARLY RECOVERY / LIVELIHOODS | 11.2 | 0.2 | 2.0% |
EDUCATION | 74.6 | 0.8 | 1.1% |
FOOD | 291.3 | 245.3 | 84.2% |
HEALTH | 83.4 | 45.3 | 54.3% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 31.2 | 10.0 | 32.1% |
NUTRITION | 10.1 | 2.6 | 26.0% |
PROTECTION | 13.2 | 7.3 | 54.9% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 55.4 | 46.0 | 83.1% |
Not specified | n/a | 5.1 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2009
Zimbabwe 2009
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/295/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2009
01-Dec-2024